It seems like a Catch-22. Ski areas expend large amounts of energy to operate (lifts running 12 hours a day, heating massive lodges, thousands of lights keeping the slopes lit for 5 hours, etc.), and at the same time, these ski areas face dramatic changes over the next century that include shortened ski seasons and higher snow levels during the winter months. That is the best-case scenario. A recent study by the University of Colorado and Stratus Consulting Inc. projects a forecast that indicates that a business-as-usual scenario (future rate of CO2 similar to our current rate) will see average temperatures rise by 4 degrees Fahrenheit at Aspen Mountain and Park City Mountain by 2030 and 8.6 degrees in Aspen and 10.4 degrees for Park City by 2100. These small changes in climate will have significant effects on ski areas, and the even worse news is that the past five years of worldwide CO2 emissions have exceeded the high-emissions scenario in the study. One significant effect is the snow-level. With the business-as-usual scenario, snow-levels are expected to rise 2,400 feet in these areas by 2100.

Mt. Bachelor in Oregon is one of 34 ski areas in the U.S. that offsets 100% of its energy
In order to keep business running, ski areas will have to take new measures that also have a negative impact on the environment, such as snow-making. Increases in man-made snow will require the diversion and storage of large amounts of water, a challenging, expensive and wasteful proposition. In addition, snow-making causes long-term damage to mountain vegetation. The good news is (more…)